It might shock some of you to know that I'm an admirer of BOTH Hillary Clinton AND Sarah Palin. (Okay, pick yourselves up off the floor...) I know what you're thinking. These two women believe COMPLETELY different things. You're right! I read a blog yesterday that said, "The only thing Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton share in common is that they have the same kind of genitals." Well, perhaps. I actually think they'd probably find a little more common ground than that, but here's where I'm going with this...although I might not agree 100% or even 10% with what a person stands for (their values) I can look beyond that to see the admirable qualities in a person. Just because I admire someone doesn't mean I'd vote for them.
I know she's not in the race anymore this year, but like her or not, you have to admit, Hillary Clinton is a sharp lady. She's a worker to the core -- you might not agree with everything she stands for, or even anything she stands for, but the fact is, she'll work to her dying day for what she believes in and with passion, and never give up. She embodies perseverance. I admire that in a person. I haven't known as much about Palin for very long, she has simply not been as prominent as Clinton. However I see many qualities in her that are admirable as well -- an equal passion for what she believes in, standing against corruption, cutting unnecessary spending, being willing to brave the storm that inevitably comes into one's life by not caving in to the "good old boy network". So now that I've told you that I admire things about both women, what the heck IS this post really about?
This post is about the questions people ask women that they would NEVER ask men. As soon as Palin was chosen as the VP pick, people rose up to question whether she should take this job, having 5 kids, one of them being a newborn baby. No kidding, I actually heard one pundit ask if she would have to bring the baby to the White House for meetings to nurse him, and if people thought that should be allowed!! I had to double over laughing on that one. (And yes, I breastfed my kids, and yes, I think it's a great thing.) It was my brilliant husband who shook his head at the stupid commenter as well and said, "you idiot, by the time she gets to the White House for meetings, if indeed she is elected VP, the baby will be at the age where he would be weaned before she's even sworn in." (I love my husband!)
Here's my thought...the glass ceiling is far from being shattered until we start asking MEN the same questions we ask women.
Do you think anyone in 21 years has ever asked my husband, "Pastor Shrodes, how do you manage to pastor the church while still having three kids in your home?"
Do you think in 21 years anyone has ever asked my husband, "Pastor Shrodes, how do you get everything done? How do you balance it all?"
Do you think in 21 years of pastoring, my husband has ever sat in an interview with a pulpit committee and heard, "Now Pastor Shrodes, you are after all, a husband and father. Do you think with that as a factor that you will be able to effectively do this job if indeed you are elected the pastor of this church?"
No, no, no. They have asked Pastor Shrodes, alright, but it's been THE WRONG Pastor Shrodes! LOL
John McCain has SEVEN (count 'em, 7!) kids and one still in the home. She was standing beside Cindy McCain yesterday at the VP announcement. Barack Obama still has two young daughters in the home. They were absolutely adorable the other night, talking into the microphone at the DNC, saying, "I love you, Daddy!" Why has nobody asked McCain how he will manage his large family, including his last child still in the home and do the job? Why hasn't anybody asked Obama how he will handle juggling the presidency and his two little girls at the same time? I realize they wouldn't ask Biden because to my knowledge, he has no kids in the home, so it's not applicable. Before you say, "well people haven't asked because their mothers are the ones raising them," I don't believe that. Both McCain and Obama seem like VERY involved fathers to me, from everything I've observed. (There you go, something I admire about both! But I can only vote for one.)
We will have shattered the glass ceiling when people are asking men the same questions they ask us.
Some of you might be ready to rattle off at your keyboard and comment or e-mail me with... "are you saying being a wife and mother aren't important?" and "don't you know motherhood is a high calling from God?" and "don't you believe in putting your kids before your job?" Answer to questions: no , yes, and yes.
I simply believe that all the same applies to my husband. Being a husband and father is important, isn't it? Being a husband and father is a high calling from God, isn't it? Being a husband and father comes before your job, doesn't it? So why aren't people asking the man the same questions?
It's obvious from some of the reading I've been doing that Todd Palin believes the way that my husband and quite a number of husbands today believe: parenting wasn't designed by God to be a one person responsibility. Single parenting is hard and most people aren't doing it by choice. God gave children a father and a mother for a reason. My husband and I believe God has given us our home and our children to lead as a team - together.
It's about a partnership. It's evident both Clinton and Palin have husbands who are partners. This is another thing I admire about both women, and something, ironically I have heard both criticized about!
Some of these questions about Palin's fitness to lead at this time come from women who strongly supported Hillary. Shame! Shame! Shame on you women!!! It's as if you forgot that Hillary ever had a child! She might be an empty nester now, but remember, she was raising Chelsea the majority of the years she was in the White House. And by all appearances it seems she and Bill raised her equally together. With all the bad you might have to say about the woman, give her this - she's a darn good mother who together with her husband raised a fine young lady. At least if you are going to criticize Sarah Palin, do it concerning her policies, not about whether she's going to nurse the baby or not, or whether she'll be able to keep the laundry done and still work on America's energy crisis. How ridiculous!!!
Ladies, ladies, ladies...let's not hold our sisters back or down by this type of rhetoric, whether we agree with their policies or not. Whether you are a Palin supporter or not, don't tear down what so many of our sisters -- and thankfully many of our right thinking and compassionate brothers --before us have worked so long and hard for.
No matter who gets elected this November, please keep in mind, the glass ceiling is not shattered until we stop asking women certain questions, or decide to ask men the same ones.
[Deanna...stepping away from soapbox now...gee, that felt good to get all that out. I feel better now. I can hear Leanne clapping all the way from Wisconsin and Tara all the way from Illinois! And yeah, I hear Patrick and Craig clapping too...gotta love those supportive men...lol]
Comments
I agree 100% - although for a few laughs, go check out "Ladies Against Feminism" for their assessment of Sarah Palin's appointment. It would be funny if people didn't actually believe that way...
It's hard for me to laugh at things like that because I realize the damage it does. I wish I were to the point where you and many of my sisters are where I could read it and laugh and just let it roll off. I actually admire you for it.
Larry just leaned over to me and said, "stop reading that! click out of it! It just garbage and it gets you upset and you don't need it..."
I read 3/4 of the way down and couldn't take any more.
Lord, help me. I really do need to take your approach more, Leanne. I'm just not there yet.
Laughter is not so much a sign of maturity as much as it is a defense mechanism in my case :o).
I am sorry that you have to deal with it "a lot" at your church...I know how painful that is because I did deal with it previously and it was almost the death of me. Never again.
Love you, my friend... and I'll pray that your "lot" will become little to non-existent.
She was raised A/G....if you go to Wikepedia and to the Religion section it gives a brief description of the churches she has attended/attends.
My husband said, "They like the perks." They have their kids compete at Fine Arts; they get to participate in some really good worship; and they get to dress how they want with no pressure to put on the prairies dresses like they would at a more conservative church.
Whatever - it's not really a HUGE group of people...just a few very vocal families, lol! It's just way more of that attitude than I'm used to - I was actually one of the more conservative people I knew; now I feel like a raving liberal.
But we all know how I feel about labels and stereotypes, so...
Tara - can't wait to read it - going there in a sec...
Leanne - I have often thought the same thing in time past when pastoring another church and came to similar conclusions. One thing I would say for you to be aware of is that it's not only the type of people who are at your church (extremist/militant type homeschoolers, etc.) who can believe that way. Those who gave me some of the worst problems in the past were not those types. (Although I've definitely dealt with some of your type.) They come in all shapes, sizes, backgrounds. lol It's not just your "prairie dress" (I laughed so hard on that one!) churches who believe that junk.
When I faced it in a previous church I wondered the same thing you did but then realized that among other reasons they stay also because...they have family in the church, they were there first (and think they will outlast you), the church is close to their home in some cases and they don't want to be inconvenienced to drive further, they don't like change and it's easier to stay and put up with the fact that you're on staff than make a switch to a new church that scares them, they are in leadership and will lose their leadership positions at your church and have to start on the "low end of the totem pole" at a new church, and the ever popular reason as you mentioned that there are programs at your church they can't get elsewhere so they stay just for that.
I do have them to thank for this...my husband and I came to be rock solid as a team and in what we believe due to some rocky waters with people like that. When you are faced with dealing with those kind of monsters you quickly have to figure out, "okay, who are we, and what do we believe?" if you don't already know it. I know you and Patrick have that figured out and you are a solid team. It seems like your pastors are too. You are blessed to have a unified, strong team. It will get you through the hard times, as it has me. Only Jesus and the power of your partnership is what pulls you through in some of the dark days of dealing with prejudicial monsters.
Love you my friend...
This couple is no longer part of our church....
Anyhoo, Michele who comments on my blog frequently (and has her own blog (An Adoptive Family's Life) is one of our board members. Many of our departmental leaders are women and of course Larry and I are full partners in leading the church. I have learned, as you have, anonymous, that usually when people believe as that couple believed, they will move on when they see the pastor is not changing their direction on the "no ceiling" principle in the church. Sometimes you have a few diehards that stick it out though, and those can be what sends you to the Ben & Jerry's Chunky Monkey or Fudge Brownie waaaayyyyy too much. (lol)
See you soon!